Showing posts with label Thoughts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thoughts. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 17, 2021

The Midwest Chronicles: Mid-American Cricket League Division II Final- Double or Nothing

After a long and winding 2021 season, the Division II playoffs of the Mid-American Cricket League, (MACL) hosted by Simply Play Cricket in Omaha (Nebraska), began with the top two Division II teams facing off in the first match. Nebraska Cricket Club endured some nervous moments before defeating arch-rival, OCC Patriots to move into the final while the loser played the winner of the 3-4 placed teams for a chance to play in the final. In due course, the Patriots took care of their end of the bargain, too, and set up a dream re-match with NCC in the final. The teams had split their two meetings of the season so the final was set up very well as the rubber match - the winner would go home with bragging rights while the loser would have to endure a long off-season.

Patriots TeamAchyuth KalluchiAjinkya Paikine (WK), Bhaskar SettiDeepak AgarwalGowtham MarananiHarish Bv (C), Kiran Gade , Sudhir KondapalliVijay YajjalaVinod YarrojuKaushik Chittam

Nebraska CC TeamAshish SathyanAsif IqbalC S Manish (WK), Jainil SavaliyaMahek PatelRamesh Suvvari, Rakshit RekhiSriram SurapaneniSuresh Gorantla (C), Vijay ReddyVinothkumar Rajendran

The Patriots made one big change in light of the previous loss to NCC - they formally changed captains, installing Harish Bv in that role. The change in captaincy did not matter as far as the toss was concerned, though, as Suresh Gorantla won the toss and immediately decided to bat first, hoping to drown the Patriots under a deluge of runs, a tactic that had worked well in the previous week.

Each team made one change - Kaushik Chittam came into the squad for the Patriots while NCC's gunslinger - Danial Faisal - went home to attend his sister's wedding (priorities...priorities!) and was replaced by Rakshit Rekhi (much more on him later on the piece).

Another difference from the previous match was in the way it started. In the Qualifier, the NCC openers had sedately played out the opening overs before setting up a launch pad for the middle order to blast off. But a week is a long time...

Harish Bv began the inning by zinging an outswinger past Vinothkumar Rajendran's bat. The next ball was a similar but declared a wide. The third ball was (as expected) an in-swinger that was going down the leg-side. Vinoth played at it instinctively and it caught the edge for the keeper, Ajinkya Paikine, to take a sharp catch moving swiftly to his left. The umpire was unmoved but Vinoth, to his credit, walked back acknowledging his misfortune. 1 for 1 in 0.2 balls. Not the start the doctor ordered, thundered the imaginary Ravi Shastri from his imaginary perch in the imaginary commentary booth.

Vinothkumar Rajendran  c †Ajinkya P b Harish B  0 (2b 0 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 0.00

The most versatile player on NCC's roster is the captain himself. Far too many times, though, it's his versatility that is a deterrent since he is willing to sacrifice his spot so others can get a chance to perform. On this, the most important day of the season, a la MS Dhoni, circa 2011, Suresh Gorantla met the moment and decided to take it upon himself to show the way and promoted himself to #3 after having spent the entire season batting at 8 or lower. 

The fielders crowded in to put more pressure on Suresh, whose main scoring shot is the nudge for a single. His immediate response to his first ball was to stand tall to a short pitched ball and upper cut it to the third man boundary to quieten the crowd. The rest of the over passed uneventfully with Suresh and Vijay stealing singles with well placed pushes.

8 for 1 after 1 over 

Gowtham Maranani took up the attack at the other end. Packing the off-side field, Gowtham began with his trademark outswinger. Vijay unfurled one of the shots of the day, calmly reaching forward to lift the ball over the infield to the cover boundary. Immediately that brought about a change with a deep cover being added to the already packed off-side field. Looking to exploit the big open gaps in the leg-side, Vijay moved across his stumps. Unfortunately for him, Gowtham got the ball to cut in, beating Vijay's forward press, pinning him LBW. Both openers were gone, 8 balls into the inning, a far cry from the nearly 100 runs that they had combined to score in the previous week.

Vijay Reddy  lbw b Gowtham M  5 (3b 1 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 166.67

In the absence of Danial Faisal, Suresh tweaked his batting order holding back Asif and calling Ramesh Suvvari to the crease. Gowtham tried the same trick again, but that only played into Ramesh's strength and he calmly flicked the ball to square leg and rushed back, in typical fashion, for a couple, followed by a more sedate single to calm the nerves. Suresh carefully played out the rest of the over.

15 for 2 after 2 overs

Ramesh has been the find of the season in the Omaha circuit and has worked his way up the batting and bowling order on the basis of his outstanding efforts in each chance he gets. With time, however, as teams got to see more and more of him, the bowlers realized that he is a leg-side dominant player whose fitness is outstanding, so he pinches twos and threes where others would jog a single. To counter that the Patriots adjusted to a 5-4 field and took to bowling outside the off-stump. 

While the rest of the league has been catching up to his strength, Ramesh has been using NCC's practice sessions to work on his off-side game. The first ball of the third over was viciously square-driven to the point boundary, resulting in another flurry of field changes. Ramesh then followed Ravi Shastri's patented advice and tapped the ball for a quick single to get off the strike. Suresh then followed his coach's advice of blocking any ball that was on the line of the stumps and pushing the ones outside the stumps for singles to finish the third over with no further damage.

23 for 2 after 3 overs.

Gowtham steamed in, building up a good rhythm and bowling faster and shorter than he had usually done this season. Ramesh and Suresh used the pace to deflect the ball behind the wicket on either side to pick up a couple of singles . The fifth ball of the over was the carrot, dangled full, fast, and outside the off-stump to Ramesh, inviting a strike across the line. Instead, Ramesh leaned forward and replicated Vijay's feat and smashed the ball to the extra-cover fence. The next ball was, naturally, quietly paddled away for a single.

30 for 2 after 4 overs

The NCC players began to breath more freely again as the early loss of the openers was slowly receding from memory. Harish continued and the first ball was flicked for a couple by Ramesh, who was well and fully in rhythm. That very rhythm resulted in disaster. The next ball was fuller, swinging into his pads and Ramesh flicked it to midwicket and took off immediately. The Patriots are, collectively, the best fielding side in the MACL and they showed why. The ball was hit fiercely but straight to the midwicket fielder, who picked up the ball and took an extra second to gauge which end to throw to. Ramesh and Suresh hesitated mid-pitch and then continued on with the (non-existent) run. The fielder could have picked either end but smartly chose to throw it straight to the bowler who broke the stumps before Ramesh could make his ground at the bowling end. 

Ramesh Suvvari  run out (Harish B)   17 (11b 2 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 154.55

Asif Iqbal came in and the two batsmen quietly played out the over producing just one single in the next 4 balls while the entire Patriots team came well inside the 30 yard circle to put further pressure on the batsmen.

33 for after 5 overs

The NCC think tank has always felt that opposing teams save their main bowler's overs for Asif. Even though Gowtham had already bowled 2 overs, unsurprisingly, he came back for a third one. Understanding that, Suresh decided to play out the entire over, to the increased frustration of the Patriots. Twice Gowtham slid onto the pads to try to give away a single but each time, the pair ran really fast to convert it into twos. Asif did not face Gowtham even once in that over.

38 for 3 after 6 overs

Knowing that Asif represented the Big Fish, Harish decided to finish his spell and came back with some vigor. The first  ball zipped past the bat. So did the second one. While the first ball harmlessly went to the keeper, the second one hit the pad right in front of the stumps! 

Asif Iqbal  lbw b Harish B  0 (4b 0 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 0.00

Just like that, the 4 batsmen whom NCC was counting on to bat a majority of the 20 overs were done for the day! The situation was a tense one and Suresh turned to the senior-most player in the 11 to defuse the situation. C.S. Manish has batted in every imaginable situation and batting position over the many years he has played but, even for him, this was a moment that held deeper meaning because of the opponent he was playing against and the fragile batting order behind him. 

A little bit of background here is necessary. In the previous match, Manish had gone into bat with a couple of overs left in the inning and swung at and missed as many balls as he connected with in trying to access the leg-side boundary. When NCC was fielding he marveled at Harish's range of off-side play and the two spoke at length about batting grips and loosening the bottom hand. One week later, Manish was primed to bite the hand that taught him.

Buoyed by gutting through the top order, Harish strived for extra pace in his last over, and three of the first 5 balls to Manish were wides that were calmly left alone. The other two honed in on the stumps and were patted back safely. The fifth (legal) ball was marginally outside the off-stump and Manish, to Harish's surprise, punched the ball through the cover region for a double. With one ball to go, inexplicably, Harish decided to change tactics and went around the wicket. He was probably aiming for a yorker at the base of the stumps. Anticipating something along those lines (and also to reduce the chances of getting out LBW), Manish took guard well outside the crease.  The resultant attempt at a yorker instead turned into a full toss that was calmly flicked over the square leg umpire and crossed the boundary after a couple of bounces. And just like that, a switch had been flicked on.

47 for 4 after 7 overs

Harish finished his spell in one go: 4.0 overs  28 runs 2 wickets (6 wides)

Unsurprisingly, with Manish at the crease, the Patriots turned to their veteran - Bhaskar Setti. There's a great deal of history between the two (but that's a story for another day) and the Patriots players vociferously reminded Manish of the potential ignominy of getting out to this particular bowler.

(As an aside, for 20 full overs, the Patriots fielders kept up a non-stop burst of chatter between balls, cheering their bowlers just as much as they sledged the batsmen. To their immense credit, not once did they veer into darker territory and everything that was said was well inside the (oft-quoted) boundaries of civility.)

Well aware of the history, Suresh decided to spoil the party once again by playing out as much of Bhaskar's bowling as possible. Also, the duo had settled on a simple strategy - for the next few overs they would carefully play out any balls that were within the stumps and only look to score off those that were outside that line. Bhaskar's strength is to bowl skiddy, low bouncing balls from a short run up. Probably because of the moment and the adrenaline coursing through him, the bowler went back to a longer run up and bowled faster than he had in many a match. He began with a wide, and then compensated by drifting onto the pads (flicked gracefully for a couple of runs) before settling into his typical stump-stump line. Three dot balls later, he changed track and got deflected to third man for a single. The last ball, finally, was bowled to Manish and was harmlessly left for the keeper to collect.

51 for 4 in 8 overs

Sudhir Kondapalli began with a wide down the leg side that was not collected cleanly, resulting in an extra run. Manish took a single off the first (legal) and sixth balls, while Suresh played out the middle stretch with a slash to third man yielding another couple of runs to his total followed by a quick single off the fifth ball.

58 for 4 in 9 overs

Finally, Bhaskar had  Manish on strike from the first ball of the over. With the drinks break scheduled to be taken at the end of the over (or after a wicket, as the Pats fielders kindly reminded the batsmen) this was going to be a pivotal over. By now, Suresh was beginning to feel the after-effects of a long stint under the hot sun. Unfortunately for him, Manish is not the type of person to jog singles. The first ball was fast, short, and wide and Manish unleashed a square-cut that his childhood idol, GR Viswanath, would have been proud of. The long grass prevented a boundary but the duo hared across the wicket to pick up three precious runs. Warming up to the occasion, Suresh promptly took a single to bring Manish back on strike. Clearly looking to make a mark, Bhaskar adjusted the field and bowled three wides in a row, uncharacteristically trying to bowl faster with each delivery. The next ball was pushed into cover for a single but Bhaskar had overstepped. Free hit coming up!!

Suresh walked across the stumps and attempted a ramp shot that took a top edge and flew high behind the keeper. Deepak Agarwal, posted at short third man, raced to his left and pulled off a stunning catch. Except, he had either forgotten or was unaware that it was a free hit. Even as he was celebrating, the two batsmen raced back and completed a second run. The rest of the over was uneventful, with Suresh and Manish collecting two singles each through the cover region to reach the drinks break with no further damage. 13 runs from the over definitely tilted the scales in NCC's favor.

71 for 4 after 10 overs

During the drinks break, Suresh's exertions finally caught up to him and he puked his entire breakfast on the ground. With half the overs still to go, Manish convinced the captain to not throw it away and hang in there a little longer. The 11th over was bowled by the erstwhile Patriots captain, Kiran Gade. Kiran bowled within himself and did not try anything different, preferring to probe away on the stumps. The batsmen played him out watchfully, content to collect singles in the off-side, playing as straight as possible.

75 for 4 after 11 overs

Ajinkya Paikine took off the keeping gloves (Harish Bv took over) and bowled his brand of fast-ish off-spinners. Manish took a liking to his bowling, first chipping him over cover for a couple and then, after exchanging a couple of singles with Suresh, getting down on one knee to fiercely sweep a fuller ball to the square leg boundary. A single and a dot ball to Suresh later another over had been negotiated.

85 for 4 in 12 overs.

Kiran's next over featured a a lot of running. Manish pushed into the gaps on the off-side for singles while at the other end a string of tired looking hoicks ensued from Suresh, who had decided to hit-out-or-get-out. Suresh managed to do neither as his hits cleared the in-field but did not reach the boundary. Manish was merciless, forcing Suresh to run as hard as he could but two doubles and a single later, Suresh began to cramp up and retired hurt to prevent more serious injury, bringing Jainil Savaliya to the crease.

91 for 5 in 13 overs

Manish took a single off the first ball of the 14th over, leaving Jainil to face Ajinkya. Jainil does not waste too much time at the crease and, at the same time, is not shy about talking back to the opposition. With each delivery, Jainil swung harder and harder at the ball in his typical fashion. An old fashioned cat and mouse game developed between the batsman and the bowler with Ajinkya trying to keep the ball out of Jainil's reach while the batsman tried his best to hit everything without getting stumped The result was the type of over that pleases and displeases both teams equally - wide, dot, wide, SIX, wide, dot, dot, dot.

101 for 5 in 14 overs

Kiran continued his steady bowling and Manish took the majority of the strike in the over which yielded three singles and a wide before Jainil pierced the midwicket region for a double to end the over.

107 for 5 in 15 overs

With 5 overs to go, the message was clear - start taking more risks. The first ball from Ajinkya was lofted by Manish over cover, the second was lofted towards deep point, the third was lofted to deep midwicket - two, two, two. Two singles later, Ajinkya went round the wicket for the final delivery of the over. The delivery was a shin high full toss that Manish went to flick and missed (a better option would have been to hit it over the bowler's head) and his enterprising vigil came to an end, trapped LBW.

C S Manish  LBW b Ajinkya P  35 (31b 2 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 112.90

115 for 6 in 16 overs

Kiran bowled a brilliant 17th over, beating the batsmen multiple times and giving up just two singles - one each to Jainil and Ashish Sathyan. Kiran finished with the tidy figures of 4-0-19-0

117 for 6 in 17 overs

The Patriots were well and truly ahead in the game now. With just 3 overs to go in the inning, Ajinkya finished off his spell. Ashish swung his bat merrily, as is his wont, connecting with as many as he missed, mostly finding the inside or outside edge of the bat. Wide, dot, two, dot, one, wide...the over went as one would expect when Ashish is at the crease. Jainil broke the spell by slamming a ball to deep cover and picking up three runs in the process. Ashish managed to find the same area off the last ball for a couple of runs.

127 for 6 in 18 overs

The pivotal 19th over was bowled by Gowtham, as was to be expected. Coming in off his long run up, Gowtham built up quite a bit of speed. The first couple of balls fetched singles. The third ball whizzed by Jainil's bat and the fielders riled up Jainil by pointing out how slow his bat speed had been in relation to the ball. It took a few seconds for everyone to settle down, by which time Jainil also calmed himself and tore into Gowtham. The next three balls were hammered to the boundary in the arc from point to cover and just like that Jainil had made an emphatic statement - Gowtham could be hit for runs, too - 14 in all in the over.

141 for 6 in 19 overs

Ashish swung and missed the first two balls of the 20th over bowled by Sudhir. A quiet word from Jaiil later, Ashish sensibly patted the ball for a single. Jainil then swung to deep midwicket and deep long off for two doubles, followed by a wide down the leg side. The last ball finally fetched the wicket the Patriots were seeking as Jainil got bowled trying to hit across the line.

Jainil Savaliya  b Sudhir K  31 (20b 3 Fours, 1 Sixers) SR 155.00

Ashish Sathyan 8 not out (12 balls) SR 75.00

From a precarious 38 for 4 in the 7th over, NCC had managed to reach a creditable 147 for 7 in 20 overs. Not a winning total but at least one that could potentially be defended IF the bowlers and fielders kept their nerve. 

If past history was anything to go by, the Patriots would attack during the powerplay and the NCC bowlers prepped themselves for it by deciding to target only one side of the ground, employing a 6-3 offside dominant field.

New find, Ajinkya Paikine, and the captain, Harish Bv, took guard against Vijay Reddy. When on song, Vijay is one of the most difficult new ball bowlers to face in Omaha. His natural delivery is one that swings in prodigiously. Unfortunately, if he lands the ball in line with the stumps, it usually swings down the leg-side for a wide. When he compensates for it and pitches it a foot outside the off-stump, the fun begins. Some balls come in alarmingly, homing in on the pads in front of the stumps while other balls go straight through. For batsmen, that presents a very difficult proposition since they do not know whether to attack through the off-side or guard against the LBW.

The first ball of the inning landed outside the off-stump and still swung way down the leg-side and beat the outstretched hands of Manish, to bounce away for two wides. The NCC keeper prides himself on not letting any wides go for extra runs and wasn't pleased in the least bit by this lapse. 

Ajinkya, having never faced Vijay before, did not appear too worried about the swing, and ambitiously flicked Vijay off the first ball but only managed to send it high in the air towards midwicket. Vinoth ran at full speed for more than 30 yards to his left but could not hold onto the catch after getting to the ball, which itself represented a great effort. A potential momentum inducing first (legal) ball wicket went abegging while the batsmen crossed over for two runs. Having learnt his lesson, Ajinkya took a single off the next ball. Vijay then bowled another wide down the leg side before Harish got off the mark with a typical cover drive. The next ball was destined to be another wide down the leg side but Ajinkya decided to instead reach for it and flick it away, very elegantly, high over the square leg umpire for a four. A single off the last ball brought the over to an end.

12 for no loss after 1 over. 

136 runs needed in 19.0 overs (114 balls) with 10 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.16

Jainil Savaliya took over at the other end, eager to continue to build on the momentum of his slog over assault. Ajinkya was beaten by a brute of a first ball, and then walked across to punch away the second for a single. Harish slashed hard at the next ball and got a four to the point boundary to get things moving further away from NCC. The rest of the over was quieter, fetching two singles while Jainil began to settle into a rhythm, bowling faster and faster with each delivery.

19 for no loss after 2 overs

129 runs needed in 18.0 overs (108 balls) with 10 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.17

With Vijay unable to control the swing, Suresh turned to Ramesh Suvvari. In the previous week, Harish had badly mauled Ramesh and the after-effects were still in the mind so it was a surprising decision and a bold one. Ajinkya promptly capitalized on Ramesh's tentativeness by slamming two fours and two doubles to squash any notion of an early collapse.

33 for no loss in 3 overs (14 runs off the over)

115 runs needed in 17.0 overs (102 balls) with 10 wickets remaining. RRR: 6.76

Jainil continued from the other end and began to hit his mark. When he gets his rhythm going, Jainil's ball appears to defy the laws of physics, actually getting faster and bouncing more than expected after it lands, continuing to rise even as it reaches the keeper. A few weeks earlier, one such delivery had taken off so dramatically, it had split the webbing between the thumb and index finger of Manish's right hand - even though the keeper was wearing gloves. By now, in this match, Jainil's bowling had begun to sting the keeper's tender hand again. Harish smartly went off strike and left Ajinkya in the firing line. The third ball of the fourth over finally produced the result that NCC was anxiously awaiting. Ajinkya was beaten for pace and before his bat could come down, the ball had crashed into the stumps and the first breach had been made. Jainil S to Ajinkya P OUT! BOWLED  

Ajinkya Paikine  b Jainil S  24 (16b 3 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 150.00

35 for 1 in 3.3 overs.

With NCC under pressure, OCC surprisingly sent in Vinod Yarroju ahead of Gowtham. This was a time to put away the game but OCC opted for the safety of keeping their highest scorer and best batsman away from Jainil and the new ball. Vinod edged the first ball away for a single while Harish could not get his bat on the last two balls of the over. By now, Manish had stepped way back and was collecting the ball well beyond the end of the concrete pitch.

36 for 1 after 4 overs

112 runs needed in 16.0 overs (96 balls) with 9 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.00

With Ajinkya out of the way, Suresh went back to Vijay and was rewarded with prime Vijay. The pacer made the ball swing into the batsmen, cramping them for room, while Suresh strengthened the leg-side to prevent extra runs from being taken. Only 5 runs came by in this over, mainly from nudges on either side of the wicket. 

41 for 1 after 5 overs. 

107 runs needed in 15.0 overs (90 balls) with 9 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.13

Sensing a shift in momentum, Suresh brought in a second slip and strengthened the arc behind point and let Jainil bowl his third over. Vinod sensibly took a single to get off strike. The next four balls were bowled with menace, each one thundering past the batsman's outside edge followed by a very long extended follow through from the bowler, who was giving back all the barbs he had endured from the batsman while their roles had been switched in the previous inning. The NCC fielders got into it, too, and began to exhort their teammates - something they kept up right until the end of the match, irrespective of the match status. With the runs drying down, Harish was getting itchy and looked to slam Jainil over long off - instead sending the ball high in the air. Vijay calmly waited for gravity to do its work and took a well-judged and very important catch.

Jainil S to Harish B OUT! CAUGHT 

Harish Bv  c Vijay R b Jainil S  8 (13b 1 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 61.54

42 for 2 in 5.5 overs

Jainil, in the excitement of finally getting to bowl to Gowtham Maranani, began with a wide before the Patriots star quietly defended the last ball of the powerplay back to the bowler.

43 for 2 in 6 overs

105 runs needed in 14.0 overs (84 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.50

The very definition of a rhythm bowler, Vijay was well and truly in his elements by now. His natural inswing was finally coupled with the ability to land the ball a foot outside off-stump and bring it into the batsmen. Both Vinod and Gowtham struggled to decipher how much to account for the inswing and managed just two singles in the over, with the remaining deliveries either being defended carefully or beating the outside edge.

45 for 2 in 7 overs

103 runs needed in 13.0 overs (78 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.92

Jainil came back for one last burst at Gowtham but the batsman was unfazed by the pace and bounce, rising on his toes to square cut and then cover drive the bowler for a double followed by a triple. The rest of the over passed uneventfully with Jainil slipping in a couple of wides in an attempt to bowl the perfect ball. Jainil's fourth and final over was his costliest, adding 9 runs to the total to finish with the fine analysis of 4-0-21-2

54 for 2 in 8 overs

94 runs needed in 12.0 overs (72 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 7.83

Vijay's last over also proved to be an excellent one. After two dot balls, Gowtham slogged a ball to deep square leg to collect three runs before Vinod struggled to get his bat on the ball, only getting a streaky single off the last ball. Vijay finished with a four run over to end up with 4-0-24-0 for the day, a good recovery after the 12 run first over.

59 for 2 after 9 overs

89 runs needed in 11.0 overs (66 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 8.09

Slowly and quietly, Suresh was putting the squeeze on the Patriots batsmen and the blazing early start had been contained even as the required run rate crept over 8 runs an over for the first time. The infield was in single saving mode with Mahek, Rakshit, Sriram, and Suresh staying well inside the circle. Rakshit and Mahek also added a nearly constant burst of chatter to keep everyone, including the umpires, well and truly awake. Team men to the core, they showed that you need not score runs or take wickets to contribute in the match.

Most teams wait for the opening bowlers to finish their spell so they can take advantage of the first change bowlers. But when you play NCC, it is a different scenario. Suresh holds back his ace - Asif Iqbal - till after the shine has gone. In another lifetime, Asif probably bowled in Australia, since his length is just short of good length but, because of his tall frame and broad shoulders, he generates the bounce typically associated with shorter pitched bowling from the rest of the bowlers in Omaha. The REAL match up of the match was at hand - Asif versus Gowtham.

Uncharacteristically, Asif began with two wides on either side of the wicket, before honing onto a metronomic line and length. Gowtham and Vinod were content to deflect the ball into the gaps and collect 5 additional singles in the over to leave both teams happy and unhappy with the outcome of the over - 7 runs.

66 for 2 after 10 overs

82 runs needed in 10.0 overs (60 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 8.20

While NCC had done well to bring things back after the torrid start, the advantage was clearly with the Patriots - with 8 wickets in hand and Gowtham still at the crease the game was theirs to lose.

NCC's most underrated (and have I mentioned versatile) bowler is Suresh Gorantla himself. With no spinners in the team (Sriram was there but had little practice so he wasn't too sure he could bowl) Suresh switched to bowling his version of fast offspin, top spinners, faster ones, and anything else that came to mind, off a short run up. With Manish standing up to the wicket, the batsmen were crease bound emboldening Suresh to experiment even further. The tactic had been set - while Asif would probe away just on or around the off-stump, Suresh would be the bait, trying to entice mistakes from the batsmen. 

One single came off the first four deliveries as Suresh focused on getting his line and length first. But the need of the moment were wickets and Suresh changed up by trying a faster one. Unfortunately for him, it was faster but not accurate and Vinod heaved a sigh of relief as well as his bat and hoicked the ball to the midwicket fence, followed by a fortuitous top edge that landed just beyond the cover fielder for two more runs off the last ball of the over.

73 for 2 after 11 overs

75 runs needed in 9.0 overs (54 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 8.33

Asif continued with his typical Asif line, giving up a quick single off the first and fourth balls while forcing the batsmen on the defensive for four precious dot balls. By now, Asif had not only begun making the ball rise off his shortish length but was also managing to get the ball to swing away from the batsman at such a pace that Manish decided to step off the concrete pitch and collect the ball nearly 20 yards behind the wicket.

75 for 2 after 12 overs

73 runs needed in 8.0 overs (48 balls) with 8 wickets remaining. RRR: 9.12

The noose was starting to tighten ever so slightly. After Vinod slogged to deep midwicket for a quick single, Gowtham was beaten by a leg spinning ball from Suresh (who knew he could bowl that!?). Suresh tried the same line off the next ball and Gowtham launched him toward wide long off. Vijay raced across to his left, collected the ball and in the same motion fired back a perfect throw to the bowler, who knocked off the bails to run out Vinod, desperately racing back to complete what looked like an easy two!!

Suresh G to Gowtham M, 1 run OUT! RUN OUT  

Vinod Yarroju  run out (Suresh G)   19 (25b 1 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 76.00

In his excitement, Suresh next ball was a faster one down the legside and he was promptly admonished by the keeper. The bowler took a couple of deep breaths and returned to bowling his slower stuff, enticingly landing a foot outside the off-stump. Gowtham tried to repeat his stroke from earlier in the over. This time, however, he tried to hit a six. Instead, he only managed to send the ball high in the air. It took a long time to come down but when it did, the ball was collected by Vijay after a slight bobble. And just like that, for the umpteenth time in his NCC career, Suresh had nabbed the Big Fish of the opposition.

Suresh G to Gowtham M OUT! CAUGHT 

Gowtham Maranani  c Vijay R b Suresh G  17 (22b 0 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 77.27

Suddenly, the complexion of the match had changed. Two completely new batsmen were at the crease and the fielding side was ahead for the first time. On the previous day, in the Qualifier match against the UNO team, in a similar situation, Kiran Gade had come and slammed 41 runs off just 24 balls to seal the game. Would he be able to replicate that on this day?

Kiran quietly took a single to long on to get off strike and Achyuth Kalluchi ignored Rakshit's pleas and quietly patted away the last ball to end the over.

79 for 4 in 13 overs

 69 runs needed in 7.0 overs (42 balls) with 6 wickets remaining. RRR: 9.86

Unsurprisingly, Asif's next over was brilliant, resulting in three hastily scrambled singles while the remaining dot balls were gratefully collected by the keeper. The batsmen showed signs of wanting to hit out but struggled to connect with the menacing bowling they faced. 

82 for 5 in 14 overs

 66 runs needed in 6.0 overs (36 balls) with 6 wickets remaining. RRR: 11.00

With Asif proving to be difficult to score off of, the batsmen turned their attention to Suresh. Kiran hit the first ball to deep cover for a double. The next ball produced a swing and a miss, followed by a single to deep midwicket. Suresh erred once again, a short ball off an attempted faster one was pummeled well over deep square leg for a six by Achyuth! The next ball was a wide on the offside before Suresh calmed down and produced a yorker that was barely kept out by the batsman for a single. The last ball of the over was going to be a key one. Suresh tried to repeat the yorker and missed his length. Kiran latched onto it and connected very sweetly with a full swing of the bat. The ball was on its way over the fence when Asif, fielding at long on, intercepted it mere inches inside the boundary!

Suresh G to Kiran G OUT! CAUGHT 

Kiran Gade  c Asif I b Suresh G  6 (7b 0 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 85.71

92 for 5 in 15 overs

56 runs needed in 5.0 overs (30 balls) with 5 wickets remaining. RRR: 11.20

While the equation was starting to move towards NCC's side, the game was by no means over as Bhaskar Setti strode to the crease. In the previous match, Asif had dismissed the Patriots veteran off the first ball he faced and, much to everyone's surprise, Suresh decided to save Asif's last over and bring back Ramesh to bowl. (In hindsight, this was understandable, since Suresh had decided to use just 5 bowlers, and with just 5 overs left, he was forced to shuffle Ramesh's 3 remaining overs in starting with the 16th).

Knowing that Ramesh was under pressure, Bhaskar pounced, square cutting the first ball to the point boundary and then stepping deep into the crease to send the next one to the square leg fence. Two quick singles later, Bhaskar went back to doing what he does best - running hard between the wickets, taking two doubles to finish off a very good over for the Patriots - 14 runs coming from it.

106 for 5 in 16 overs

42 runs needed in 4.0 overs (24 balls) with 5 wickets remaining. RRR: 10.50

Achyuth got into the act, biffing Suresh for a double to deep midwicket. The next ball was an ugly swing and a miss. Not surprisingly, the third ball was a faster one down the leg side that, for once, Manish was unable to collect cleanly and two wides were added to the score. Bhaskar took a gently run single to bring Achyuth back on strike. The hitter swung and missed again but half-connected on his next two swings to score another set of doubles to end the over and Suresh's match-altering spell.

114 for 5 in 17 overs

34 runs needed in 3.0 overs (18 balls) with 5 wickets remaining. RRR: 11.33

Ramesh gave Achyuth a single to midwicket but then got hammered to the cover boundary by Bhaskar, who seemed to have stablished a hold over the bowler in his short stay. Ramesh took a deep breath, talked to his captain and keeper and switched to bowling round the wicket and turned into a completely different bowler. Bhaskar could only play out two more dot balls as he began to swing harder than he usually does and failed to make contact. With the pressure mounting, Bhaskar swung again at a wide-ish ball, but only managed to send it high in the air towards point where Suresh held on for a splendid catch under duress.

Ramesh S to Bhaskar S OUT! CAUGHT 

Bhaskar Setti  c Suresh G b Ramesh S  18 (10b 3 Fours, 0 Sixers) SR 180.00

Inexplicably, Ramesh tried a short pitched ball to Kaushik Chittam and the left-handed batsman gleefully pulled it away for three runs to end the over that produced 8 runs and a vital wicket.

122 for 6 in 18 overs

26 runs needed in 2.0 overs (12 balls) with 4 wickets remaining. RRR: 13.00

The pivotal 19th over was, therefore, Asif's responsibility. Kaushik took a single off the first ball. The next 5 balls were short and fast, aimed at Achyuth's chest. The batsman stepped out of the way and swung cross batted and missed the next two balls, edged to third man for a double, and then missed the 5th ball, too. With one ball to go and everyone on the edge, Achyuth swung again and this time he connected big time to send the ball way over the cover boundary for a gut-punching six! In spite of the last ball blemish, Asif finished with the wonderful line of 4-0-21-0 on the day.

131 for 6 in 19 overs

17 runs needed in 1.0 overs (6 balls) with 4 wickets remaining. RRR: 17.00

With the left handed Kaushik at the crease, Ramesh stayed with his round the wicket line. The first ball was a wide down the leg side. The second ball was even wider down the legside. And so was the third ball! Thankfully for NCC, their keeper moved across swiftly and collected all three of them with no fuss, preventing additional runs from leaking. Suddenly, it was down to 14 runs off 6 balls. The next ball was a yorker on the pads that Kaushik flicked away for a double. The second (legitimate) ball was punched past the bowler for a single. The third ball was attacked by Achyuth but only resulted in an inside edge onto the pads for another single. Kaushik hit the fourth ball hard to the midwicket area but only got a couple. The fifth ball was a pinpoint yorker and resulted in a hastily dug out single to the bowler. With one ball to go and 6 runs to tie, Ramesh delivered once again - a yorker that Achyuth could do nothing except hit back to the bowler to end the match!

141 for 6 in 20 overs - NCC WON BY 6 RUNS!!

After going more than 11 years having never defeated the Patroits, the NCC team pulled of back-to-back wins over the Patriots in two consecutive weeks. What pleased the NCC think tank the most was that the two wins had been achieved in contrasting styles with the team pulling off a narrow victory while scoring big as well as while defending a small(ish) total.

For his splendid all round performance, Jainil rightfully received the Man of the Match Trophy. A special mention should be made of Mahek Patel, Rakshit Rekhi, and Sriram Surapaneni, who did not get to bat or bowl but stayed energized for the entire 20 overs, choking off the off-side with their fielding and impactful banter (Rakshit especially, with ample support from Mahek. As we all know, Sriram did not utter a single word, preferring to let his fielding do the talking).

With that, the official 2021 season came to an end. The victory will be spoken about for a long time as it was a much sought after labor of love for the older players, who have a better idea of the history of the rivalry.

To see the complete scorecard and other details of the match, click on this link.

Until next time, au revoir.

Thursday, January 21, 2021

The strength of the wolf is in the pack

 The Indian cricket team just did the seemingly unthinkable - beat Australia at it's ultimate stronghold, the 'Gabba! And did it in incredible fashion, chasing down 328 runs on Day 5 against the most potent quartet of bowlers in the world, including the top dog - Pat Cummins who is the #1 bowler by a fair distance.

In no particular order, here are some random thoughts that are floating through my head as I think about the match:

1) Speaking of colossal mismatches - nothing summarizes it better than this - at the start of the Test match, the Australians had collectively taken 1033 Test wickets while the Indians had a sum total of 13 (including 2 by Rohit Sharma who is not a bowler any more...though, ironically he did end up bowling in this match).

The famed Australian quartet took 17 wickets in this Test while the unfancied Indian bowlers took all 20 on offer.

2) Poor Tim Paine. For the last two years he has done his best to revamp the image of the Aussie team. All his hard work may have gone in vain because of his "conversation" with R Ashwin during the waning moments of the Sydney Test where he lost his cool. That may end up defining him as much as Kim Hughes is remembered for his teary press conference or Michael Clarke is for his "broken arm" sledge to Jimmy Anderson.

3) T20 cricket has changed the way we approach targets. When 140 plus runs were required in the last session, no one spoke in terms of time but only in terms of overs left. When 50 runs were required in 8 overs with only 5 wickets in hand, it was considered very achievable - a thought that would have resulted in shuttered doors even as recently as a decade ago (see below). It was a tight equation but 26 runs were plundered off the next two overs by Sundar and Pant and, suddenly, the match was gone from Australia's hands for all intents and purposes (except for minor blemishes from Sundar and Thakur that injected some excitement into the proceedings).

4) In 2011, the India cricket team had a golden chance to win a Test match in the West Indies. Chasing 180 to win, they were 94 for 3 when MS Dhoni agreed to a draw with the mandatory 15 overs (in the final hour) about to be bowled. The batsmen who were still not out or in the pavilion? Dravid, Laxman, Kohli, Dhoni and Harbhajan. As it was happening then, I was flabbergasted at how the Indian captain, fresh off a World Cup triumph, gave up the ghost of the chase so easily. I was thinking of that match as the last hour started in Brisbane. 

At Brisbane, at the start of the mandatory 15 over final hour, India needed 69 runs to win

Batting: Pant (51) and Agarwal (9) with Sundar and Thakur after them

At Roseau, in 2011, at the start of the mandatory 15 over final hour, India needed 86 runs to win

Batting: Dravid (34) and Laxman (3) with Kohli, Dhoni, Harbhajan after them

The fear of failure weighed heavily on the 2011 team. Unencumbered by any such pressures, the 2021 team finally released some of the anguish of that failed chase of a decade ago.

5) Rishabh Pant was the first visiting batsman to record scores of 25+ in 10 consecutive innings in Australia (surpassing, among others, Viv Richards who had a streak of 8). He got 23 in the first inning at Brisbane, snapping that streak, but then added 89* in the second inning. His scores across all Tests in Australia read:

25, 28, 36, 30, 39, 33, 159*, 29, and 36, 97, 23, 89* in this series

6) The Indian 4th inning was a tale of two strategies. At one end Pujara scored 56 in 211 balls, typical of a team fighting for a draw and at the other end Gill, Rahane, and Pant scored a combined 202 in 306 balls, symbolizing a team going for the win. Chalk and cheese, black and white, night and day - the beauty of Test cricket is that it can simultaneously accommodate two entirely opposite batting styles. As Harsha Bhogle pointed out in his post-match review after the Sydney Test - Test cricket showed the value of two opposite approaches seeking the same common goal (even there he was referring to Pujara and Pant's approach to the task at hand right at the start of the video). 

7a) At the end of day 4, Indians prayed for rain. And rain is what they got - a rain of runs!

7b) Actually, it DID rain. There were surreal scenes with about 20 overs to go when the ground was bathed in bright sunlight and yet the players were playing in a drizzle from a passing cloud. Maybe the gods felt the need to bless the batsmen as they dreamt the unthinkable.

8) Cummins set a record during the 2019 Ashes series for the most number of wickets in a 5 Test series without a five-for when he took 29 wickets with no five wicket hauls. In this 2020-21 series, Cummins once again led all bowlers with 21 wickets and no five-fors. I do not know if that is a record for a 4 Test series but it has to be up there if it isn't.

But it says something about Cummins: I do not recall him having a defining spell where he blasted away the opposition like Broad or Steyn or even Bumrah seem to have in our memory banks.

9) The man who spent the most time in the middle (after Pujara) seemed to be Nitin Patel, the physio. The number of times he ran onto the field to tend to an injured player almost warrants a sponsorship deal from someone!

10) Over the course of 8 innings (both teams combined), 123 wickets fell on helpful tracks but there were only three 5-for (Pfeiffer in honor of Dean Jones) hauls in the series - two by Josh Hazelwood and one by Mohammad Siraj.

(***PTS messaged me to point out that in the entire series, the number of centuries scored was in the same ratio - Australia had two centurions (Smith, Labuschcagne) while India had just one (Rahane).)

11) In 2018, when India finally breached the Aussie stranglehold we were told that the result would have been different if Steve Smith and David Warner had been there. (And, they did not have Marnus Labuschagne either at that point in time). In this series, they had all of them at various times. In fact, Australia won the Test where Steve Smith contributed only 1 run and lost (or drew) the matches where he scored centuries or fifties. 

I am actually very happy that there were no broken Aussie players or missing players for any reason. There are no excuses left on that front to explain away the losses.

12) The Australian batting line-up was very brittle. Even Labuschagne received numerous lives in all his innings and it could have been much worse for Australia if India's fielding had been as disciplined as its batting or bowling. Even in the first Test at Adelaide, after posting 244, India had Australia reeling at 111 for 7 when Bumrah dropped an easy catch off Paine. The Aussie skipper then counter-attacked (with more luck and lives) and kept the lead down to just 54 runs. The rest is history (36 and all) but think about how the Test may have played out had we gotten them all out for, say, 125 and batted with a lead of 100 plus rather than having to come in the next morning on a fresh day at 9 for 1 and a lead of 63 runs.

13) After the events of the Sydney Test, where tremendous amount of energy was spent in achieving the draw, I was concerned that there would be a let down at Brisbane. I was convinced that if we lost the toss, the Australian batsmen would bat us out of the game. And they were close to doing so - at 200 for 3 (Editor's note: I had previously noted that it was 206 for 2, which was actually the score in the Sydney Test).**. From there onwards, the resilience and fight of the Indian team came to the fore. Getting Australia all out for 369 was a monumental feat. Had they reached 450 or even 400, it would have been devastating.

Actually, Rahane lost all three tosses in the Tests he captained, adding another layer of improbability to the stupendousness of the series win. Time after time, the odds were stacked against the team and they kept overcoming it. All along we had been told that the GOAT (Lyon) would be unleashed in the 4th inning on a wearing wicket while exploiting the footmarks made by Starc. Lyon was more bleat than roar.

14) Fame is fleeting, ephemeral. Success is occasional, failures are more common. The playing 11 at Brisbane will look nothing like the playing 11 in the next Test against England. In my estimation, only Sharma, Gill, Pujara, Rahane, and Pant are certain to play. The other 6 are unlikely to feature since the following will return: Kohli, Bumrah, Sharma, Ashwin...leaving spots for only 2 other players, who may both be spinners. I do not know when Thakur or Saini or Natarajan or Sundar will play again for India. If you think it is unlikely they'll never play again having contributed to this win, think about this:

The miracle of Kolkata 2001 was the last Test match for: Nayan Mongia and Venkatapathy Raju 

The euphoria of victory did not extend their careers. They were replaced by Sameer Dighe and Nilesh Kulkarni (for whom Chennai was the last Test of his career, too).

15) The value of Pujara's self-denial became apparent to me the moment I realized that when Cummins opened the bowling after lunch, he was already into his third spell of the day. And when Hazelwood replaced Cummins, it was his third spell, too. Drip by drip, drop by drop...the miles started piling accruing on those legs and when the second new ball was available the engine was willing but the body was not as sharp.

16) The loss was disastrous for Australia's World Test Championship (WTC) hopes. Here's what needs to happen in order for Australia get to Lord's for the final.

The unexpected series defeat against India has severely dented Australia's chances of making the top two. Their points percentage has dropped to 69.2, and they will need 89 points from the three-Test series against South Africa - which is yet to be confirmed - to go past New Zealand. That can only happen if they win at least two Tests and draw the third, in which case they will get 93 points from the series.

And, since you asked, this is what has to happen for India:

India have moved to the top of the table, with a points percentage of 71.67, with New Zealand currently second. To stay ahead of New Zealand's 70%, they need 80 more points out of 120 in the four-Test home series against England. They can get there with a 2-0 series win; if they lose one Test in that series though, they will need to win three. Given India's home record in the last eight years - 28 wins, one loss in 34 Tests - they should fancy their chances of securing those 80 points.

The WTC has added a new wrinkle to Test series, providing an additional layer of context where the outcome of a series matters not only to the participants but also to other nations, which is a good thing.

17) After the second Test, I had some misgivings about the umpires. I did not doubt their bias or their skill. Rather, I felt that there might be a subliminal tendency of lenience towards the Australians. For example, there were decisions that were given out to an Aussie bowler while a similar appeal from an Indian bowler was turned down (subsequently overturned on DRS appeal). That was my perception and it was reinforced when a few "out" decisions against the Indian batsmen were overturned upon review. 

The fears that I had turned out to be largely baseless and unfounded. I did not sense any such umpiring bias during the fourth Test and was, actually, very impressed with the umpiring of Bruce Oxenford and Paul Wilson. Sure, they had to overturn a decision or two but there was nothing that was egregiously out of place. In fact, considering how tense the match was they were outstanding. I was particularly impressed with Paul Wilson, who seemed very calm and measured in everything he did. I hope he grows in stature and umpires more games.

And I dislike the rule that an umpire cannot stand in games featuring his home team. In this day and age with the scrutiny they go through and the ability to use DRS to overturn decisions, we could keep one umpire at least from the home nation on the ground, I would think.

18) In the long, storied history of Test cricket, never have 20 players been used by an away team during the course of a series. India did that this time, demonstrating the incredible turnover from test to Test, so much so only two players - Rahane and Pujara - played all 4 Tests for India. High turnover is usually associated with teams that lose by huge margins not series winners. Yet another amazing stat in a series filled with bizarre stats and facts.

19) When the series began: 

Ravichandran Ashwin had 365 wickets in 71 Tests. 

Nathan Lyon had 390 in 96 Tests.

The series ended with Ashwin on 377 (12 in 3 Tests) and Lyon on 399 (9 in 4 Tests). 

Ashwin clearly outbowled and outperformed Lyon in the latter's den (pun intended). I am going to make a very bold prediction - Ashwin will reach 400 Test wickets before Lyon reaches 400. You heard it here first!

19) Prior to the Brisbane Test, the general consensus was that the Indian team should stack it's roster with every healthy batsman available and hedge their bets and bat out for a draw. When the team was announced I was surprised to see FOUR fast bowlers and one spinner. FIVE bowlers on a ground that favors bowlers. It took guts to make that call and, in the end, turned out to be an inspired one when Saini pulled up lame. Kudos to the team thinktank for deciding that taking 20 wickets was more important than scoring an additional 50 runs while facing a larger deficit. 

It also put more onus on the batsmen to perform, knowing that there was little to follow as we effectively played with three #11 batsmen. The top order batsmen didn't score as big as they should have but knowing there was nothing behind them probably made Thakur and Sundar value their wicket even more and score all the runs they did. Runs that won us the game, honestly speaking, since it tired out the Aussie bowlers and demoralized them. Further, in the second inning, even when Agarwal got out (more on that below) there wasn't too much panic since we still had Sundar and Thakur to come. Think about that last sentence again. It's a sentiment that would have been improbable to consider at the start of the Test!

20) When Mayank Agarwal was padded up in the pavilion, I was content thinking that we had a competent player should the second new ball need to be played out in Brisbane. His first inning of 38 was very promising until a strange blunder - trying to punch on the up to the second ball after the lunch break, doomed him. I thought he would have learned from that but he did not. One ball after Agarwal survived a DRS review for caught behind he, inexplicably, tried to loft over the in-field and gave a catch to Wade at short cover. The fielder accepted the chance. Ironical since Wade himself had been guilty all series of gifting away his wicket to the Indians! 

If Agarwal had not perished and had survived till the end with Pant, imagine the plaudits that would have followed him. It is good to "play your natural game" but, at times, some context needs to be enforced. 

And, no, I would not have applauded his courage if that drive had gone to the boundary. I know it for a fact because, even as Cummins was running in, I was thinking to myself - play out the over, play out the over, expecting something disastrous to happen.

21) Shubman Gill scored: 45, 35*, 50, 31, 7, 91 - 259 runs @ 51.80 

I watched almost every ball of all his innings. I do not recall him being hit on the body even once. Every other batsman had moments of concern or times when they were flinching and getting hit, including Labuschagne and Smith. I do not know if it my mind blocking it but Gill came out unscathed, I think. He plays beside the ball and his technique will be tested in England or whenever the ball moves in the air but speed did not bother him one bit. Take a look at these highlights (see above/below) and just listen to the sound of the bat hitting the ball - it is hitting the sweet spot more often than not (look at the 1:12 mark as Isa Guha points out, too). And when you hook Starc in front of square leg (at the 2:25 mark, for example) it means you have a lot of time to play the ball. What a player. I hope he stays hungry and grounded and plays for another 15 years. (Touch wood). And if he does that...uff....who knows how many runs he will score.

22) During the first inning of the 4th Test, the broadcaster's shared an amazing bit of information. According to their ball tracking software, Pat Cummins had not bowled a single ball down the leg side in the whole series. In the whole series. Just think about that. To bowl at his level and not stray even once is as much evidence as anyone needs to support his standing as the #1 bowler in the world. What a bowler. Test after Test, inning after inning, spell after spell, over after over, ball after ball, he just ran into and through the wall relentlessly attacking the batsman. If Pujara was the immovable wall, Cummins was the irresistible force. 

23) On his YouTube channel, Ashwin sat down with the fielding coach, R Sridhar, and got him to reveal what happens off the field while the action we know so well unfolds on it. Ravi Shastri comes out looking really good from a tactical and leadership point of view. Many nuggets of information are revealed with a good dose of humor and self-deprecation. 

It's in Tamil but has subtitles if you don't follow the language. Well done, Ashwin.



24) One moment stood out for me from the above video. Sridhar pointed out that, after the dismal batting collapse of 36, the conventional wisdom was that the batting should be strengthened. Instead, the Indian think tank went the other way - strengthened the bowling by making it a 5 bowler attack and relying on Jadeja to replace Virat Kohli. What a masterstroke it proved to be. Simply brilliant. Especially when Yadav pulled up lame in the second inning.

I still think Ravi Shastri is more of a rah-rah guy than a nuts-and-bolts coach but he has, smartly, surrounded himself with very competent coaches in the specialist positions of his support staff. While they take of the nitty-gritty stuff, he is able to macromanage the whole thing in his typical, bombastic way. Kudos to him and his support staff for keeping the players focused on the big picture while not dwelling on the past.

25) BD asked if if I thought Brisbane 2021 trumped Kolkata 2001 as the definitive Test win for an Indian team. This was my response to him: 

On an individual basis, Kolkata 2001 still comes out on top, in my opinion. Considering the context (following on 274 runs behind, playing a team with a streak of 15 straight Test wins, the Final Frontier, and the fact that in the Aussie team there were at least 5 all-time Australian Greats - Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Ponting, Waugh and 4 Modern Greats - Hayden, Junior Waugh, Langer. Gillespie and the last 2 - Slater and Kasprowicz - were no mugs by any stretch of imagination) the Kolkata win was more improbable and seminal.

As a whole, this Test series has to be almost the best ever, even factoring in recency bias.

Each Test had its own script and context. No two Tests were similar and all were enthralling.

Every Test, every session was meaningful. No lulls...no periods of boring domination. (The 36 was mesmerizingly bewildering and so out of the blue... it wasn't domination so much as dream-like. It's how Hazelwood would have dreamt bowling a perfect Pfeiffer would be when he was a kid).

26) As Julius Caesar once proclaimed: Veni, Vidi, Vici.

Tuesday, April 10, 2018

Linked up

1) I do not follow Major League Baseball closely any more. I'd be hard-pressed to name 5 players who are currently active. The first name that comes to mind, though, is Ichiro Suzuki. I recently wondered whether he had retired and came across this haunting, haunting piece about Ichiro - the man who has become the very thing he hated to become as a 3 year old. Very sad.

2) If a tree is falls in a forest but there is no one to hear it does it make a sound? The best bowling analysis EVER in a T20 match happened at Lal Bahadur Stadium in Hyderabad but to the cricketing it world it does not exist. Alfred Absolem took a scarcely believable  7 wickets for 15 runs but his achievement will probably never be acknowledged because it was a played between two teams in the Indian Cricket League (ICL) which was obliterated by the IPL/BCCI within a few years.

3) The only NFL player I actually wanted to watch in person was Randy Moss. I managed to do it once at Ford Field in Detroit. If you want to know why he has great, watch this: EVERY TD of his greater than 40 yards. Mind you, these are only those that were 40 yards or longer....


Tuesday, March 27, 2018

The unluckiest man in the world

Some time ago, Steven Smith had a "brain fade" in India. And the first time he made the mistake, he got caught and apologized for it.
... because that was certainly the only moment that ever happened
A few days ago, Steven Smith made a "poor choice" in South Africa. And the first time he made the mistake, he got caught and apologized for it.
This is the first time it has happened under my leadership. 
Poor guy. He has the worst luck in the world. Imagine how he must feel knowing that the first time he does something wrong, he gets caught right away.

Yeah, right!!! "First time" indeed.

Hmpff...where's the sarcasm font when you need it?

The Price of Power

Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad with power
Charles A. Beard

One week ago, Steven Smith was the undisputed leader of the Australian team. Of late his batting had reached a plane occupied by only The Don himself. He led a rout of the English in the Ashes and began the tour of South Africa with a thumping win in the first Test. Life was good. 

Today, he stands on the cusp of the unknown, his Fate hanging in the balance, to be determined by others whom he has no control over. A rabid mob is baying for blood, happily throwing stones from glass houses, determined to bring down a man who was flying so high, he didn't realize he was getting perilously close to the sun.

Paradoxically, even as the sun is melting his wings it has begun to set on his playing career. Not in the physical sense. Smith will come back from this after serving whatever ban is imposed on him. He is 28 years old and, I suspect, will be given a one year ban from the game. Much like Shane Warne's one year exile in 2003 did no damage to his ultimate playing aura, Smith's year in absentia will not impede him too much.   

The sun is, however, setting on his reputation. Once someone is labeled a cheat, that sticks for life no matter how hard you try to make amends for it. Especially in today's world of instant condemnation and slow forgiveness.

I'm not sorry for Steve Smith. He decided to cheat and should pay the price for doing it. Most importantly, because it was premeditated.

Integrity is doing the right thing when no one is watching you.

Unfortunately, for Steve Smith, over 30 cameras were watching closely. Thank heavens they were.


Monday, July 17, 2017

High on the hills was a lonely GOAT

Only one man could bring me out of blogging semi-retirement: the Rajah himself.

The story arc of Roger Federer's resurgence has been written many times over by multiple authors around the world and I will not repeat it here. A cursory Google search will suffice. Instead I want to put down some random, disjointed thoughts that float through my brain...

a) For a long time DH and I were reconciled to the fact that he'd be stuck on one prime number - 17. When he won #18 earlier this year in Australia, DH remarked that he would HAVE to win one more to get back to a prime number because that's where he should be (by himself and one). Well, what do you know? It may be time to start thinking of 23 now. Impossible? Well, many of us thought 18 was impossible.

b) Remember this commercial from 10 years ago? It was released on July 6th, 2007, just moments after Roger had won his 10th major and was narrated by Tiger Woods who ended it with the haunting words: My name is Tiger Woods. I have 12 majors and counting. So keep up, buddy.

Yesterday, Roger did what Tiger always dreamed of - overtaking Jack Nicklaus' major count (18). For the record, Tiger has stalled at 14 for over eight years and it does not appear he is going to add to that total.



c) The Federer of 2017 is winning because he is better than the Federer of a few years ago. He is winning because he has improved. His backhand, especially, is a lot flatter and more potent. the elegant top-spin laden one has been beefed up by another version - a flattened, whiplash of a shot that singes across the court with power that is approaching Wawrinka territory.

d) The 2017 Wimbledon final was, finally, lacking in excitement or prolonged tension for Federer. But I am not complaining one bit. I'll take that any day over the 5 set gut-wrencher from earlier this year at the Australian Open where he was (gasp!) trailing 1-3 in the fifth set. Even today I sometimes break into a cold sweat thinking about what might have happened had Roger not raised his game.

Imagine this - Nadal wins the Australian Open. Suddenly the major head-to-head is 17-15 in Roger's favor with the French Open coming up where Nadal would make it 17-16. Oh dear...the GOAT narrative would have taken a drastic turn for the worse for us FedFans. Phew! Thank heavens for that atomic backhand (and Robin Soderling).

e) The loss to Juan Martin del Potro at the 2009 US Open stung for a long, long time. Then came the capitulation to Marin Cilic in 2014 when all Roger had to do was take out Cilic and then Kei Nishikori (neither of whom he had ever lost to at that point in time). For years, I've wondered what those two missed US Opens would have done for his legacy. Suddenly, after what has transpired this year, the pain has eased tremendously.

f) Roger is the only man to have played at least 5 finals at each major. At the French, he has one win (in 2009, thank heavens for Soderling) and 4 losses to the clay GOAT - Rafael Nadal. One wonders what the actual count might have been if the gods had not sent Nadal to mess with us FedFans.

g) But seriously, just watch these 5 games from the 5th set of the 2017 Australia Open again and marvel at how close it was to being a completely different narrative. A matter of inches...literally, on multiple occasions.



h) In 2012 after the Olympics in London, in spite of winning a silver medal, it seemed quite inconceivable that Federer would last as long as Rio in 2016. Verily, it came to pass - Federer did not play in Rio while recovering from his myriad injuries. But if you had told me in 2012 that he would not play in Rio but would win multiple majors in 2017, I would not have believed it possible. I am still having a tough time believing it.

i) Hailing from a nation where we revere the Krishnans and Amritraj for simply making it to the quarter-final at Wimbledon, it is astonishing to think that Federer has played 70 Grand Slam events (tied for first all-time with Fabrice Santoro) and has reached the quarter-final or better in 50 of them. Yes, 50 of them!

j) For a man known for the beauty of his groundstrokes and the fluidity and grace of his foot movement, it is mind-boggling to think that he is third all-time in the list of aces hit on the ATP tour. And, if he plays the rest of the year, he's definitely going to be #2 behind Ivo Karlovic.

k) The final word has to, definitely, belong to the late, great David Foster Wallace from his famous essay: Federer as a religious experience. Mind you, this was published on August 20, 2006, almost 11 years ago, but it still resonates just as loudly today:

... Roger Federer is showing that the speed and strength of today’s pro game are merely its skeleton, not its flesh. He has, figuratively and literally, re-embodied men’s tennis, and for the first time in years the game’s future is unpredictable. (...) Genius is not replicable. Inspiration, though, is contagious, and multiform — and even just to see, close up, power and aggression made vulnerable to beauty is to feel inspired and (in a fleeting, mortal way) reconciled.

(Credit: SI.com)

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

For the want of a nail

In an alternate universe somewhere Ravindra Jadeja does not drop Alistair Cook, Pankaj Singh gets the first (of many) wickets, India gains ascendancy and wins the Test series against England, Alistair Cook is sacked as captain, India goes to Australia buoyed by their away win, Saha does not suffer a brain fade at Adelaide and Kohli is able to pull off a monstrously incredible Test victory and gives the perfect speech in Hughes' memory, India gains further confidence, wins the Test series, steamrolls through the World Cup semi (where Kohli does not drop Johnson), pulverizes New Zealand in the final.....

Months later, I still relive that dropped catch.

Because Ravindra Jadeja did not take a simple catch at point, a kingdom was lost.

Monday, June 08, 2015

Giving thanks - part 1

For the past few days I have been reflecting on everyone I have to be thankful to for shaping me and my life. Apart from the usual suspects (family and close friends) there are a few I need to remember while I can for the little things they showed me or did for me.

In no particular order:

BPJ: He did a lot of things for me and I cannot thank him enough for them. But the biggest thing he probably did was insisting that my PhD funding was tied directly to being able to drive the departmental truck to our field site. If I did not get the license to do so, he said my funding would be revoked. As simple as that. And it worked. And he insisted that I take official driving lessons to do so. It changed the direction my life was to take.

EP: My driving instructor. Even now when I change lanes, take an exit, brake for a traffic light, take a curve or parallel park, I apply the little tips and rules he told me during our hour-long night sessions so many years ago. All our sessions were in the dark and it rained during every one of them (which maybe one reason why I am more comfortable driving at night than in the day time, relatively speaking).

GM: I would not have taken his course if a researcher at ISU had not taken back his offer of a fully-funded PhD program. But, in hindsight, I am glad the offer was rescinded. The way I teach today is based almost entirely off the GM playbook. He had the incredible gift of being able to take a complex issue and simplify it so the students could learn it piecemeal without losing sight of the bigger picture. Someday, I hope to be half as good as he is.

RP: Bored me to death with his long-winded, one-sided conversations but he did teach me one important thing before he left for Atlanta - how to iron my clothes. Don't scoff...it is not as simple as he made it look.

SM: When the temperature drops and the house gets cold I remember his tip - take a hot shower and then you'll be fine, And the bathroom also becomes the warmest room in the house in the winter.

RT: His simple policy for office hours - if the door is open, come right in - is one that I practice. Nothing gives me more joy at work than having a student walk into my office, sit down, and chat about life in general.

KDK - One week after I received my driver's license I was convinced to be the sole driver on a road trip to Alabama. A lifelong love for the open road and spending weekends in different places was born. The confidence I gained from that trip was immense and life-changing.

SKP: The most generous and giving person I have ever met. Never said no to any request for help without compromising on his ideals. I am not as good as he is but at times I have my moments.

JM: The first person in the US who took me aside and talked to me about my anxieties. He was my professor (and adviser) but I never felt a gap between us. When I wasn't sure if I was good enough to do a PhD, he took me to CEM's office and the two of them convinced me I was capable of it in just two sentences. More than half the labs I teach in my Ecology course are ones I learned from him. He passed away recently and has been in my thoughts a lot since then.

KM: Taught me how to cook dinner for two in 20 minutes or less. And also gave me his warmest winter coat when he moved back to Japan so I did not freeze as much when I walked to my classes.

CR Jr: Ice-fishing? Check. Canoeing? Check. Rafting through rapids? Check. Playing croquet? Check. Golfing? Check.  Indoor soccer? Check. Trapping coyotes for research? Check.How to throw a football in a perfect spiral? Check. Spelunking? Check. Bowling? Check. There are more "firsts" that C was able to check off my bucket list but you get the picture. He even drove me to WV and back from Illinois just so I could visit with BPJ and see the PhD program there.

JM: For teaching Biometry. The best statistics course I have ever taken and even today I can teach basic stats without referring to notes because of him.

Reading the tea leaves

When the draw for the men's singles event of the 2015 French Open tennis tournament was announced, all eyes were focused on the quarterfinal where two titans were slated to clash against each other. Learned reporters nodded their collective heads and the phrase de facto final was bandied about.

After the first four rounds, the mega-clash came to be and so it came to pass - the winner of this particular quarterfinal DID win the French Open. While most people thought it would be the Djokovic-Nadal clash, any true tennis fan knew - the de facto final was the all-Swiss clash between Wawrinka and Federer. When Federer lost, my good friend DH and I knew that the GOAT had missed a golden opportunity to pad his resume.

Either way, watching Stan Wawrinka's blistering one-handed backhand made me smile, albeit with a tinge of sadness that it wasn't the other Swiss one-handed backhand player mesmerizing the audience.

चलो कोई बात नहीं, Federer नहीं तो Wawrinka ही सही!


Thursday, March 12, 2015

They speak...I learn...or not

I have watched a few of the matches in the World Cup; bits and pieces of about 50% of them; major bits of about 25% and all the India matches except the second inning of the most recent game against Ireland.

From listening to the commentators this is what I have learned or realized:

Shane Warne: According to him - the best way to win a game at any point in time is to bowl a spinner, preferably a leg-spinner. Leg-spinners, no matter how filthy their bowling, are the best wicket-taking options in the world. Bar none. A pitch is magnificent no matter how many runs it leads to. Awwww.....is a new word that we should all learn to use in our daily lives.

Sunil Gavaskar: If a batsman is near a milestone, our man will sniff it out in a heartbeat. You can tell a lot about his mentality from the way he appreciates milestones, game situation be damned. Also, he has a curious habit of making a joke, explaining it, and then repeating the joke again for emphasis just in case we had forgotten it.

Sanjay Manjrekar: I actually like the guy and the insight he brings in each of his stints. He picks up a hatke point of view. Unfortunately, he will then spend the next 15 minutes beating it into the ground by repeatedly pointing it out. Glenn Maxwell was at the crease in a recent match en route to his first ODI century. Manjrekar stated early on that Maxwell is an atypical batsman in that he does not play the ball or the bowler but instead frames his batting based on the type of field being set. Brilliant point. And then, for the rest of the session this lesson was drummed into our senses with each Maxwell hit. I was hoping for further insight into how captains could counter that strategy or bowlers could plan and make Maxwell hit into areas he is less comfortable (or would take more risks) hitting to. I am still waiting for that.

Kiwi commentators:All the Kiwi commentators have been excellent so far. Treating the game with respect, discussing strategy, pointing out the good (and bad) things players are doing, and staying quiet when needed and letting the crowd shots tell the story at times. (Luckily I have not heard Danny Morrison so far).

Channel 9 commentators: Back-slapping, inside-joke telling, laughing out loud once-every-minute, Aussie propaganda stumping.  All of these are what I have (unfortunately) come to expect from them. They are rah-rah boys of the worst kind. They often don't even know who the opposing players are and sometimes will (shockingly) admit it. How can they not research the 22 players on the field before beginning their stint? How can the producers of the show let them get away with displaying such ignorance?

Mark Taylor: Special mention - he hasn't met a non-Aussie name that he hasn't mangled. I cannot fathom how he neither cares nor tries to pronounce players names correctly. That is just rude and inconsiderate and unbecoming of someone who, at times, has insightful things to say, especially related to strategy and game plans.

Rameez Raja: Like Ravi Shastri, he has about 10 stock phrases that he uses in varying patterns. Has not done much research for years and it feels as if the only cricket he watches or follows is the little bit he sees when he is commentating.

There are others, plenty of them. If you are interested shoot me their names and I will tell you what I think of them.

Saturday, November 29, 2014

Grateful to a GOAT

For many years I watched sports to root for a particular team, usually the Indian cricket team. But all that changed after I lost touch with (watching) cricket in the 1990's. When I was finally able to watch cricket again, the way I watched sports had changed.

I no longer root for a team. Instead I root for individual players and, by proxy, the teams they play for. I realized this aspect the year(s) I rooted for the New England Patriots (gasp!) simply because Randy Moss was on their roster. Now that Moss has left, I am back to not caring for the Patriots.

As the years have gone by the number of sportsmen who make me turn on the TV/computer to watch them has diminished due to retirement. VVS Laxman, Randy Moss, post-2010 Sachin Tendulkar and Greg Maddux were the prominent ones on the list. There are some stragglers who I don't watch any more but used to a until a few years ago like Jeff Gordon, Kobe Bryant and Tiger Woods (in his prime, El Tigre was as deadly and clutch under pressure as any sportsperson as I have ever seen).

Today, there is just ONE sportsman whom I try to watch whenever I get a chance to because I never know when he will stop playing professionally. A few days ago, it gave me great pleasure to wake up early in the morning to watch the man tick off one of the last items missing from his career resume - the Davis Cup.

Look at that concentration! He takes "watching the ball till the last moment" very seriously.

Watching Roger Federer play tennis is something else altogether. Most matches are won or lost on his terms because he is relentlessly attacking in nature, always looking for a way to end the point. The way he glides across the court, the way he manufactures shots from seemingly-impossible angles are the reasons I watch. In the future, there may be others who win more than him or have a more impressive career resume than him. But none of them will be able to convince me that Federer is not the best all-round tennis player I have ever seen. I was privileged enough to watch him once in person on Arthur Ashe stadium at the US Open and that memory is something I will always cherish. 

Roger is not my favorite tennis player ever (that would be Ivan Lendl) but he is definitely the one who has given me the most joy. Even as he fights Time and plays as well as he can, I know the light is burning fiercely but the candle is burning out soon. Yet he is out there "tarnishing" his legacy in the eyes of some, piling up the years without Grand Slam titles. But he is not going down quietly. He ended 2014 a few points shy of the #1 ranking (I predict he will return to #1 sometime before May 2015) and wowed us with the Davis Cup triumph and continues to play on.

And for that I am very grateful.

Saturday, October 04, 2014

The curious incident of the dog in the nighttime

So, Sunil Narine's bowling action has been found to be illegal and he has been suspended from further participation until he rectifies it (in some tournaments and not others...but that is grist for another mill).

Sunil Narine in action.
(Click here for photo credit)
I have ALWAYS thought his action was dicey, so I am not surprised. In general, I do not like bowlers who have jerky actions so I am not shedding tears at the recent clampdown on illegal bowling actions.

Here is what is interesting to me in the entire Narine saga: even as various conspiracy theories are floated for the timing of the ban and many folks (including Clive Lloyd) fume about the ban itself, one thing is striking - no one is defending Narine's action as being legal. Not. One. Person.

Everyone is harping on about how he has been allowed to bowl for so long (as if that is reason enough to not suspend him now) and how it is w itch hunt bu why is no one even talking about the elephant in the room - that his action is dodgy.  That to me is more damning than any video evidence.

Raise your hand in protest, Mr. Narine, but be sure you don't bend that elbow when you do so.